Speaking Reps

⬅️ Hub: 30 Rhetoric · Method: Adversarial Debate Prep - A Learning Method · Template: Speaking Rep · Companion: AI Sparring Session

Closed-book, two-minute, one-take reps against a position card. This is the practice half of the system: sparring tests the argument tree, reps test whether you can produce it out loud under pressure.

Why this exists — from your own method note

“Retrieval failure — I had the answer and couldn’t produce it. This is a practice problem, not a content problem — do not add notes. Do closed-book reps.”
→ Adversarial Debate Prep - A Learning Method

That diagnosis has been in the vault since July. There was no template for the reps. This is it.

---

A smaller starting point

My Learning Process includes a brief reading-to-explanation exercise and a way to diagnose whether the obstacle is understanding, recall, an inference, or expression. This page supplies the optional formal two-minute speaking workflow.

How to run one

1. Pick a card from the table below. Read it once. Close it.
2. Wait 60 seconds. Do something else — the delay is the test.
3. Record two minutes, one take, no restarts. Answer one of:
   • “Explain your position on X.”
   • “What’s the strongest objection, and your answer?”
   • A pressure question lifted from the card’s reply matrix — the hardest one.
4. Transcribe it. Paste it raw.
5. New note from Speaking Rep. Paste the transcript, run the analysis prompt inside it.
6. Do the one fix. Not the list. The one.

The rule that makes this work

Score the breakage, not the wins. A rep where you sounded good and learned nothing was a waste of two minutes. The reps where you fell apart are the ones that pay.

---

Cards ready to rep

Start with the hardest one

Conservatism. Its thesis is the newest (“Burkean liberal”), so it’s the least rehearsed — and its steelman is the strongest in the set. If you can hold that one closed-book, the rest are easier.

---

Rep log

Add a row per rep. The point of the log is the trend, not any single row.

What to watch across reps

• Fillers and hedges falling = delivery improving.
• Same support going missing every time = that headline isn’t memorable. Shorten it on the card.
• Repeated RETRIEVAL diagnoses on one card = keep repping it. Do not add notes.
• Repeated CARD diagnoses = the note is the problem. Fix it once, every future rep improves.
• A ⚠️ claim spoken aloud = the failure mode this whole system was built to catch. Verify it or strike it from the card.

---

Where this sits in the loop

Frame → opposition research → steelman → argument tree → evidence briefs
      → AI sparring [[AI Sparring Session]]  ← tests the ARGUMENT
      → speaking reps [[Speaking Rep]]        ← tests the RETRIEVAL
      → repair → real debate → post-mortem

Sparring tells you whether the position survives contact. Reps tell you whether you can produce it when there’s no time to think. They fail differently, and the fixes are opposite: a broken argument needs more research, a broken retrieval needs less to remember.