Skip to content
Read • Question • ConnectAnthony’s notes & researchReturn with a new question
Anthony’s NotesA personal field guide
From the notebook

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel)

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (Sou

South-Africa-v-Israel.pdf

Written pleadings — timetable checked 9 November 2026

The 21 May 2026 order sets 22 November 2027 for South Africa’s Reply and 22 May 2029 for Israel’s Rejoinder. It records Pretoria’s eighteen-month request and Israel’s conditional acceptance of equal response time. These dates govern pleadings, not delivery of judgment.

The South African Presidency’s explanation describes a normal second round and the need to answer jurisdiction objections. Provisional protection and a final merits ruling are distinct stages.

Article and the proposed change to the legal test

Article summary, reported motives, and primary-source audit separates the reported strategic explanations from verified procedure, and examines Ireland’s actual submissions about interpretation and proof. It also records the forthcoming Myanmar judgment and the limits of drawing conclusions about litigation motive from timing.