Skip to content
Read • Question • ConnectAnthony’s notes & researchReturn with a new question
Anthony’s NotesA personal field guide
From the notebook

Hate Speech Prosecutions

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has a comprehensive legal framework to address hate crimes, leading to numerous prosecutions across various protected characteristics. Below is an extensive list of notable hate crime prosecutions in the UK:

1. Homophobic Harassment of a Shop Owner (November 2022):

A man was convicted of a homophobic public order offence after repeatedly using homophobic remarks and other derogatory and threatening comments to harass a shop manager. He pleaded guilty and received a 12-month community order, an indefinite restraining order prohibiting contact with the victim, and a 12-month exclusion from the shop. Additionally, he was ordered to pay £200 in compensation to the victim, an amount increased due to the hate crime element. 

2. Racially Aggravated Harassment of a Restaurant Worker (January 2023):

A 39-year-old male repeat offender was convicted of racially aggravated intentional harassment after being verbally abusive towards a 17-year-old Black female staff member in a restaurant. He pleaded guilty and was charged accordingly. 

3. Mark Meechan (2018):

Known online as “Count Dankula,” Meechan was convicted of a hate crime for posting a YouTube video teaching his girlfriend’s dog to perform a Nazi salute, considered grossly offensive. He was fined £800.

4. Jayda Fransen and Paul Golding (2018):

The leaders of the far-right group Britain First, Fransen and Golding, were found guilty of religiously aggravated harassment for targeting innocent individuals they believed to be involved in a rape trial. Fransen was sentenced to 36 weeks in prison, and Golding received 18 weeks.

5. Joshua Bonehill-Paine (2016):

A far-right extremist, Bonehill-Paine was sentenced to two years in prison for inciting antisemitic hatred by promoting a “Jewish invasion” protest in London.

6. John Nimmo and Isabella Sorley (2014):

Both were jailed for sending abusive tweets to feminist campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez. Nimmo received eight weeks, and Sorley received 12 weeks in prison.

7. David Norris and Gary Dobson (2012):

Convicted for the racially motivated murder of Black teenager Stephen Lawrence in 1993, both received life sentences.

8. Pavlo Lapshyn (2013):

A Ukrainian student, Lapshyn was sentenced to life imprisonment for the racially motivated murder of Mohammed Saleem and plotting explosions near mosques in the West Midlands.

9. Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale (2013):

Both were convicted of the murder of British soldier Lee Rigby in a religiously motivated attack in Woolwich, London. Adebolajo received a whole-life term, and Adebowale was sentenced to life with a minimum of 45 years.

10. Ian Watkins (2013):

The lead singer of Lostprophets was sentenced to 29 years in prison for numerous sexual offenses, including attempting to rape a baby. While not a traditional hate crime, the severity and nature of his offenses against vulnerable victims drew significant attention.

11. R v. Rogers (2007):

The defendant was convicted under the Public Order Act 1986 for racially abusing three Spanish women, highlighting that hostility based on nationality can constitute a racially aggravated offense.

12. R v. Woods (2002):

Woods was convicted of a religiously aggravated offense after making anti-Muslim remarks following the 9/11 attacks, showcasing the legal system’s stance against religious hate crimes.

13. 2024 United Kingdom Riots:

Following the murder of three young girls in Southport, misinformation led to widespread riots. Numerous individuals were prosecuted for hate crimes during this period:

• Derek Drummond (August 2024): Sentenced to three years for attacking a police officer and participating in a racist mob outside a Southport mosque. 

• Liam Riley and Declan Geiran (August 2024): Received 20 and 30-month sentences, respectively, for involvement in violence in Liverpool. 

• Unidentified 28-year-old man from Leeds (August 2024): Sentenced to 20 months for stirring up racial hatred online during the riots. 

• Unidentified 34-year-old woman (August 2024): Sentenced to 20 months for pushing a burning wheelie bin towards police during a demonstration in Middlesbrough. 

• Unidentified 53-year-old woman from Cheshire (August 2024): Sentenced to 15 months for suggesting a mosque should “be blown up with the adults inside” on Facebook. 

• Unidentified 30-year-old man (August 2024): Sentenced to three years for a racially motivated attack during a riot in Manchester. 

These cases exemplify the UK’s commitment to prosecuting hate crimes across various contexts and protected characteristics, reflecting the legal system’s dedication to addressing and deterring such offenses.

France

France has a robust legal framework to combat hate crimes, with numerous prosecutions highlighting its commitment to addressing offenses motivated by bias. Below is an extensive list of notable hate crime prosecutions in France:

1. Convictions Related to the Murder of Samuel Paty (December 2024):

In December 2024, eight individuals were convicted for their roles in the 2020 beheading of teacher Samuel Paty. The sentences ranged from six months with electronic monitoring to 16 years in prison. Notably, Brahim Chnina received 13 years for making false accusations against Paty, and Abdelhakim Sefrioui, a hardline Islamist leader, was sentenced to 15 years. Two associates of the killer received 16-year sentences for complicity. 

2. Brigitte Bardot’s Convictions for Inciting Racial Hatred (1997-2008):

French actress Brigitte Bardot has been convicted multiple times for inciting racial hatred. In 2008, she was fined €15,000 for a letter criticizing the ritual slaughter of animals during Muslim festivals, which was deemed an insult to the Muslim community. This marked her fifth conviction since 1997 for similar offenses. 

3. Michel Houellebecq’s Acquittal on Charges of Insulting Islam (2002):

Author Michel Houellebecq faced charges for calling Islam “the stupidest religion” in a 2001 interview. In 2002, a French court acquitted him, ruling that his remarks criticized a religion rather than inciting hatred against its followers. 

4. Jean-Marie Le Pen’s Conviction for Inciting Racial Hatred (2005):

Jean-Marie Le Pen, founder of the National Front party, was convicted in 2005 for inciting racial hatred after comments suggesting the Muslim population in France would lead to the submersion of French culture. He was fined €10,000. 

5. Convictions Following Cyberbullying of Paris Olympics Artistic Director (October 2024):

Artistic director Thomas Jolly faced severe cyberbullying after the Paris Olympics opening ceremony, which celebrated LGBTQ+ representation. Seven individuals, aged 22 to 79, were charged with death threats, aggravated insults, and cyberbullying. The charges underscore the growing issue of online hate crimes in France. 

6. Investigation into Death Threats Against Israeli Olympic Athletes (July 2024):

French police launched an investigation into death threats received by three Israeli athletes during the Paris Olympics. The threats, considered antisemitic hate crimes, led to heightened security measures for the athletes and underscored concerns about antisemitism in France. 

7. Conviction of Bruno Gollnisch for Holocaust Denial (2007):

In 2007, Bruno Gollnisch, a member of the European Parliament, was convicted for Holocaust denial. He received a three-month suspended prison sentence and was fined €5,000 for questioning the existence of Nazi gas chambers. 

8. Legal Proceedings in the Killing of Sarah Halimi (2017):

Sarah Halimi, a Jewish woman, was murdered in 2017 in what was widely recognized as an antisemitic attack. The assailant, Kobili Traoré, was deemed criminally irresponsible due to his state of delirium from cannabis use, leading to significant public outcry and debates over the handling of hate crimes in France. 

9. Conviction of Muhammad Abdallah Kounta for Anti-White and Antisemitic Posts (July 2024):

French sprinter Muhammad Abdallah Kounta was suspended by the national athletics federation over social media posts deemed “anti-white, anti-France, and antisemitic.” The case was referred to the public prosecutor, potentially leading to prosecution. 

10. Conviction of Hervé Eon for Insulting the President (2008):

In 2008, activist Hervé Eon was fined €30 for holding a sign that read “Get lost, jerk,” directed at then-President Nicolas Sarkozy. The European Court of Human Rights later overturned the conviction in 2013, emphasizing the importance of freedom of expression. 

These cases illustrate France’s ongoing efforts to prosecute hate crimes and the complexities involved in balancing freedom of expression with the need to protect individuals and communities from hate-motivated offenses.

Germany

Germany has undertaken numerous prosecutions to combat hate crimes, reflecting its commitment to addressing offenses motivated by bias and discrimination. Below is an extensive list of notable hate crime prosecutions in Germany:

1. National Socialist Underground (NSU) Trial (2013–2018):

The NSU, a far-right terrorist group, was responsible for a series of racially motivated murders between 2000 and 2007. The primary defendant, Beate Zschäpe, was convicted in 2018 of ten counts of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. Accomplices received sentences ranging from two and a half to ten years. 

2. Halle Synagogue Shooting (2019):

In October 2019, an armed assailant attempted to attack a synagogue in Halle during Yom Kippur, resulting in two deaths. The perpetrator, Stephan Balliet, was convicted in 2020 of murder and attempted murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with subsequent preventive detention. 

3. Conviction of Ernst Zündel for Holocaust Denial (2007):

Ernst Zündel, a known Holocaust denier, was charged in 2005 with inciting racial hatred. In 2007, he was sentenced to five years in prison under German laws prohibiting Holocaust denial and hate speech. 

4. Raids Against Online Hate Speech (2023):

In early 2023, German law enforcement conducted nationwide raids targeting individuals suspected of posting misogynistic hate speech online. This operation was part of Germany’s broader efforts to combat online hate crimes. 

5. Increase in Far-Right Crimes and Online Hate Speech (2024):

In 2024, Germany experienced a significant rise in crimes attributed to the far-right, driven largely by online offenses and hate speech. This surge was partly linked to global events, such as the Gaza conflict, highlighting the challenges in addressing online hate and its real-world implications. 

6. Conviction of Michael Stürzenberger for Incitement to Hatred (2024):

Activist and blogger Michael Stürzenberger was convicted in 2024 for incitement to hatred due to his criticism of Islam during a 2020 rally. This case underscores the complexities and controversies surrounding Germany’s hate speech laws. 

7. Investigation into Online Insults Directed at Vice-Chancellor (2024):

In late 2024, a 64-year-old man faced investigation after German Vice-Chancellor Robert Habeck filed a criminal complaint against him for calling Habeck an “idiot” on social media. This incident highlights the legal boundaries of online speech in Germany. 

These cases illustrate Germany’s proactive stance in prosecuting hate crimes, both offline and online, to protect individuals and communities from bias-motivated offenses.

Islamists Prosecuted

Several individuals and groups identifying as Muslims or Islamists have been prosecuted for hate crimes across various jurisdictions. Below is an extensive list of notable cases:

1. United Kingdom:

• Abdullah el-Faisal (2003): A Jamaican-born Muslim cleric, el-Faisal was convicted in the UK for soliciting the murder of Jews, Americans, Hindus, and Christians, and for using threatening words to stir up racial hatred. He was sentenced to nine years in prison. 

• Ihjaz Ali, Kabir Ahmed, and Razwan Javed (2012): These three men were convicted for distributing leaflets calling for the death penalty for homosexuals. This landmark case marked the first conviction under hate crime legislation in the UK for disseminating anti-gay literature. 

• Anjem Choudary (2024): A prominent Islamist preacher, Choudary was sentenced to life imprisonment for directing the banned terrorist organization al-Muhajiroun (ALM). He was found guilty of promoting support for ALM through online platforms and meetings. 

2. France:

• Convictions Related to the Murder of Samuel Paty (2024): Eight individuals were convicted for their roles in the hate campaign leading to the 2020 murder of teacher Samuel Paty, who was killed after showing caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad during a class on free expression. Sentences ranged from one to 16 years in prison. 

3. Netherlands:

• Amsterdam Assaults (2024): Five individuals received lenient sentences for coordinated attacks against Israelis in Amsterdam. These assaults, among the worst antisemitic incidents in the Netherlands since the Holocaust, targeted fans of Maccabi Tel Aviv. 

4. United States:

• Abdullah el-Faisal (2023): After being extradited from Jamaica, el-Faisal was convicted in New York for recruiting and soliciting support for ISIS. He was sentenced to 18 years in prison. 

These cases illustrate the legal actions taken against individuals and groups who, under the guise of religious or ideological beliefs, have engaged in hate speech or hate-motivated actions leading to criminal prosecutions.

Based on the provided web results, there are fewer documented cases of Muslims being prosecuted for hate speech against other religions in Europe compared to cases where non-Muslims are prosecuted for speech against Islam. Here’s what can be inferred from the available information:

  • General Observations:
    • The focus of the results is predominantly on hate speech against Muslims or Islam, with specific cases, laws, and discussions around this topic. This might reflect a bias in reporting, the focus of the original query, or the nature of legal actions taken in Europe.
  • Cases of Muslims Being Prosecuted for Hate Speech Against Other Religions:
    • France: There’s a case of French Muslims being prosecuted for inciting hatred against Jews, linked to the Union of Jewish Students in France (UEJF) accusing Twitter of not removing hate speech. This indicates that hate speech from Muslims against other religions can lead to legal action, but it’s not as extensively covered or frequent in the provided results.
    • UK: In the context of religious hate crimes, there’s a mention of crimes against Jewish people being the second most common after Muslims, suggesting that hate speech or actions by Muslims against other religions are legally addressed, though with fewer reported instances in these results.
    • General European Context: The Council of Europe and various national laws aim to combat hate speech against all religious groups. However, the emphasis in the results seems to be more on protecting Muslims from hate speech rather than prosecuting them for it.
  • Legal Framework and Application:
    • European hate speech laws are generally designed to be religion-neutral, protecting all religious groups from discrimination or incitement to hatred. However, the enforcement and public attention might differ due to various socio-political factors, including the rise in Islamophobia or anti-Semitism, which can influence which cases gain more visibility.
    • The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) has databases and reports covering hate crimes against various groups, including Muslims, Jews, and others, indicating that there is a structure for monitoring and potentially prosecuting hate speech across religions.
  • Cultural and Political Context:
    • Public and political sensitivities can influence which hate speech cases are highlighted or prosecuted. For instance, there’s been significant international focus on Islamophobia in recent years, which might explain the skew in reported cases.
    • However, there are also instances where Muslims face legal action for hate speech against other groups, but these cases might not receive as much attention or be as widely reported.
  • Conclusion:
    • While there are legal mechanisms in place to prosecute hate speech from any group against another, including Muslims speaking against other religions, the provided information suggests this happens less frequently or with less public attention compared to hate speech directed at Muslims or Islam.
    • The disparity might be due to various factors including media focus, the nature of hate speech incidents reported, or the political climate influencing which cases are pursued or highlighted.

If you want further clarification or more detailed information, we might need to perform another search or look into specific national statistics or case studies not covered in these results.

Protection of Islam Mocking

Several countries in Europe and beyond have laws or interpretations where mocking Islam can be considered a form of hate speech:

  • Iceland: Under Article 233 a. of the Icelandic Penal Code, publicly mocking, defaming, denigrating, or threatening an individual or a group for their religion, including Islam, can lead to fines or imprisonment for up to 2 years.
  • United Kingdom: The UK has laws under the Public Order Act 1986 and subsequent amendments which criminalize hate speech. This includes speech that is threatening or abusive and is intended to stir up religious hatred, which could encompass mocking Islam if it meets the criteria of the law.
  • France: French law prohibits public communication that is defamatory or insulting or that incites discrimination, hatred, or violence against a group based on religion, among other criteria. Mocking Islam could fall under these provisions if it’s seen as inciting hatred or discrimination.
  • Germany: Germany has hate speech laws that penalize incitement to hatred against segments of the population, including religious groups. Mocking Islam in a way that promotes hatred could be prosecuted under these laws.
  • Sweden: Recent posts on X suggest that Sweden has laws like “hets mot folkgrupp” (“agitation against a population group”), which now includes religious groups. This means that mocking Islam could be prosecuted if seen as hate speech against Muslims.
  • Netherlands: Although not explicitly stated in the provided information, the Netherlands has robust hate speech laws that could potentially cover mocking Islam.
  • Switzerland: Posts on X indicate that Switzerland might have laws or court interpretations where mocking Islam could be seen as hate speech, although specific legal details are not provided.
  • Denmark: While Denmark values free speech, actions like burning the Quran have led to legal consequences or public outcry, suggesting that extreme forms of mocking Islam might be prosecuted or at least heavily criticized under hate speech or public order laws.
  • Norway: There’s mention of Norway in the context of hate speech and religion, indicating that mocking Islam might be actionable under their hate speech regulations.
  • Austria: Austria has laws against inciting hatred based on religion, which could include mocking Islam if it’s perceived to incite hatred or discrimination.
  • UAE (United Arab Emirates): In the UAE, insulting Islam is punishable by imprisonment and/or fines, clearly marking mocking Islam as a legal issue.
  • Qatar: A post on X mentions that defaming Islam, among other religions, can result in a seven-year prison sentence, indicating a strong legal stance against mocking Islam.