Communism Debate - Andrew Wilson VS Haz Al-Din

Andrew Wilson
- Doesn’t like Enlightenment American principles
  - No American identity to adopt
  - Led to progressive zeitgeist
  - Rejects Hegel’s philosophy
- Bolshevik Jewish Communists killed Orthodox King, takeover
- Communism = Continual social revolution until they get it right
- Andrew Jackson cancelled debt
- The people of the nation are the collateral
- Egalitarian principles create micro groups and they will steal money, part of democracy, communism doesn’t solve this, absent a totalitarian government structure
- Giovanni Gentile
  - Points out large group by numbers will swallow up smaller groups
- How will Communism if its a democracy stop groups that are in the majority not steal the wealth?
- People want to own things themselves
- Banks don’t have force doctrine, but if you transfer the wealth to the government, they do have force doctrine, what redress will the people have?
Haz Al-Din
- It all goes back to debt
- Debt used by 1%
- Cancelling the debt
  - What Bolshevik’s did
  - Lenin’s first act, cancelling foreign debt, french banks
- Why did the debt come back after Andrew Jackson?
- One party dictatorship
- Bolshevik’s WERE NOT Jewish
  - Jews were only a majority of Politburo for less than 2 years (were around for decades)
  - Not Jewish
    - Stalin
    - Lenin
    - Main positions of control
  - Jewish
    - Lazar Kaganovich (Transportation)
    - Yugoda
- Trotsky were not a Bolshevik or thought leader; latched on last moment in Bolshevik revolution