Ana Kasparian vs Pearl Davis on Feminism

Below is the same “completeness pass” for only the text you pasted (from roughly 5:55:09 through the break at 6:48:36, plus the short fragments around 7:03–7:26 included in your paste).
I’m not verifying any of this. I’m listing every concrete example, named entity, stat, anecdote, slogan, or specific scenario each side invokes.

Side A (Anna) — all examples and specifics she cites

A1) Claims about Pearl’s past statements and appearances

• “May 2024 appearance” on Tim Pool’s “Culture War” podcast: Pearl said women “aren’t really doing much,” “not having kids,” “not contributing to the economy,” and uses it to argue women should not have the right to vote
• Pearl “benefited from” earning a degree; Anna names Elmhurst University (spelled “Elmherst” in transcript)
• Pearl debated Trent Horn and (Anna claims) said men are better off “shacking up” instead of marrying
• Anna says Pearl’s reasoning in that debate: women are “too fat” and “STD infected”
  • Pearl interjects “25%” and Anna says Pearl “did say that”

A2) Macro “women contribute” examples (workforce/GDP/unpaid labor)

• Women are 47% of the American workforce
• Council of Economic Advisers: women contributed substantially to U.S. economic growth since 1970
• By 2017, women were responsible for ~40% of GDP, “$7.6 trillion”
• “Trillions of dollars” of unpaid labor (household work, raising children, caring for parents)

A3) Sector-specific workforce examples

• Healthcare: women are ~80% of workers (per Bureau of Labor Statistics) = 16.4 million women
• Education degrees:
  • 1960: women earned <35% of bachelor’s degrees
  • “Today”: women earn ~58% of bachelor’s degrees
  • Women earn >60% of master’s degrees

A4) Geopolitics framing example

• Competing with China in an “increasingly multipolar world”

A5) Domestic violence / law / policy examples

• U.S. Department of Justice: intimate partner violence rates decreased >60% from 1994 to 2010
• Attributes the decline to:
  • protective order statutes
  • funding for shelters beginning in the 1970s and 1980s
• Claims a two-income household is more resilient during downturns and correlates with:
  • improved child health
  • improved educational attainment

A6) Title IX and Pearl’s volleyball history (named specifics)

• Title IX (1972), signed by Nixon
• Pearl’s volleyball:
  • played for Elmhurst University’s volleyball team
  • earned all-conference honors as a senior
  • pursued professional volleyball in London
• Anna uses these to say Pearl isn’t living a “traditional” life she advocates (Anna’s framing)

A7) Birth-rate decline alternative explanations (examples)

• Anna says critics blame feminism for weakening families / lower birth rate, but (Anna’s alternatives):
  • impact of the internet
  • social media on relationships
  • economic instability
  • young people citing personal finances as main reason for delaying marriage

A8) Promiscuity / STD parity example

• National Library of Medicine: “modern men are just as promiscuous as modern women”

A9) Anna’s personal marriage example (used as counterexample)

• Married husband when:
  • her career was already established
  • he was couch surfing
  • he was in debt
  • didn’t know what he wanted to do
• Says economic freedom let her marry for love, not for a “Chad to take care of me”
• Pearl asks “How tall is he?” Anna says 6’1 (about Pearl’s height)
• Pearl asks “How many kids did you give him?” Anna: none, she doesn’t want kids

A10) Divorce / custody / child support statistics Anna cites

• Women are twice as likely to fall into poverty after divorce (Anna references “the data” generally)
• Alimony is paid out in 10% of divorces
• Census Bureau: average child support payment is $441/month
  • only 60% of those payments “get paid out” (as she states)
• Custody:
  • 95% of custody cases are mutually agreed outside court
  • women get full custody 40%
  • men get full custody 20%
  • shared custody 40%
• Says shared custody is ideal if neither spouse is abusive

A11) “Empirical evidence vs anecdotes” examples

• Repeatedly says she needs:
  • “actual studies”
  • “statistics / empirical evidence”
  • not “anecdotes,” “vibes,” “feelings”
• Pushback to Pearl’s “I interviewed people” as not sufficient evidence

A12) Positions on specific policy questions (with examples)

• Fraud should be illegal (in response to paternity-fraud question)
• False paternity is “wrong” and should have legal consequences
• Men should pay child support; there should be legal repercussions for violating court orders
• Says she supports:
  • 50/50 custody when both parents are capable caretakers
  • jailing women for false rape accusations (she says “yes” for rape; later clarifies it depends on what the accusation is, but gives rape as “yes”)

A13) Rebuttals to Pearl’s claims / examples Anna uses

• Against “women fly planes, they crash them”:
  • Anna demands “empirical evidence”
  • Pearl cites “we all saw that plane crash on the East Coast”
• Against “women are to blame / privileges” framing:
  • says “US has the highest maternal mortality rate of any developed country” (as a counter to “not many women die in childbirth”)
• Against “women don’t do dangerous jobs / police” framing:
  • mentions her sister-in-law is a cop
• Against Pearl’s prison-for-defamation framing:
  • asks if Pearl wants prison for defamation
  • clarifies defamation penalties are civil (as she frames it)

A14) Jeffrey Epstein example (inserted late)

• Jeffrey Epstein: “young women preyed upon as minors”
• Claims:
  • he got a sweetheart deal
  • “multiple administrations, Democrat and Republican” engaged in a coverup
  • victims “never get justice”
• Frames it as an example of court injustice affecting women (as a contrast to Pearl’s male-centric focus)

Side B (Pearl) — all examples and specifics she cites

B1) “Man-on-the-street / dating standards” examples (from your 7:03 fragment)

• “Can you apologize for wrecking the world?”
• “You ruined cars.”
• “You invented divorce.”
• “Man on the street” videos: first thing women say is “six figures / seven figures”
  • not “good sense of humor”
• Anna responds: “Cherry picks” (Pearl says she does the interviews)

B2) “Dirty and dangerous jobs” examples (open debate prompt)

Pearl asks: what’s Anna’s plan when men stop doing dangerous jobs. Examples listed:

• Logging
• Plumbing
• Crab fishing
• Oil rig work
  Also broader “walking away” examples:
• men stop doing dangerous jobs
• men stop getting married
• men stop having kids

B3) “Societal collapse” scenario examples Pearl predicts

• Men stop protecting women “in the streets”
• Men stop signing up for “infrastructure jobs”
• Birth rate keeps falling
• Future is “bleak” for feminists

B4) “Marriage is happiness” counter and Pearl’s counterexample claims

• Anna cites studies: married couples happier
• Pearl counters:
  • “Divorce is terrible”
  • “Correlation doesn’t mean causation”
  • “People marry happy people”
  • says Anna is attributing happiness to marriage incorrectly

B5) Class/marriage pattern examples

• Pearl: marriage rates dropped globally; less marriage among lower socioeconomic status / middle class disappearing
• Pearl’s explanation: “women marry rich” / people forgo marriage due to finances
• Anna’s “would you marry broke?” question becomes a repeated example:
  • Pearl refuses to answer directly (“Love is love is love”)

B6) Male-dominated industry stats list (Pearl’s big list)

Pearl rattles off a list of sectors + percentages dominated by men (as she states):

• Food: 88% men
• Power grid: 93% men
• Transportation: 95% men
• Communications: 90% men
• Material production: 78% men
• Software: 80% men
• Auto workers: 98% men
• Carpenters: 98% men
• Electricians: 98% men
  Then says removing top male-dominated jobs means:
• no running cars
• no housing
• no electricity
• no “open machinery”
• no materials/fabrics
• no computers
• no buildings
• no Amazon delivery

B7) “Men get nothing / enslaved” examples Pearl accuses Anna/feminists of

• “You want men enslaved to women for nothing in return”
• men “on the hook” for:
  • child support
  • alimony
• accuses Anna of never advocating for men victimized by:
  • paternity fraud (because she’s been “on the air for 20 years”)
• “men do all the work, get no credit”
• men will “walk away” and feminists have “no plan”

B8) Pearl’s “policy backlash” anecdote about Anna

• Pearl claims Anna advocated left-wing policies for 20 years and then was “assaulted by a homeless person”
• Anna responds she was sexually assaulted by a guy; Pearl frames it as “result of what you voted for”

B9) “Women not taken seriously” dispute example

• Pearl claims Anna said women’s opinions aren’t taken seriously “in a YouTube video”
• Anna demands a quote
• Pearl points to the “headline event” being two women on stage as counterexample

B10) “Healthcare jobs reversal” challenge example

• Pearl flips the “plan” question:
  • “What is your plan for when the 80% women in healthcare no longer want to do it?”
  • “Give the jobs to the men. They’ll do it better.” (Pearl’s proposed answer)

B11) “Women in high-responsibility roles cause disasters” examples

Pearl claims:

• “women fly planes, they crash them”
• “women almost burned down California”
• “people are dying because they want to make women feel better”
• Cites a specific-ish reference:
  • “We all saw that plane crash on the East Coast”
  • “bang 300” later (see closing list)

B12) Career attrition stats for women in male-dominated careers

Pearl claims feminism pushed women into male-dominated careers that they quit:

• Female lawyers quit: 48% to 73% (depending on firm type), often junior/mid-career
  • “one quarter” cite workload/burnout/mental health
• Women with engineering degrees in past 15 years:
  • 73% “never entered the field professionally or quit early / mid-career”
• Female accountants:
  • 55% quit before or at midlevel
• Women in STEM:
  • attrition ~50%
• Companies “bend over backwards” to hire women, even “discriminating against male qualified candidates”
• Women are “2.5x more likely” to take antidepressants than men
• Pearl’s interpretation: money/prestige isn’t worth the stress; women prefer lower pay/workload and higher job security
• Women go to college, take loans they can’t afford for careers that won’t pay those loans

B13) Consumer spending and debt examples

Pearl cites:

• “women put their biggest expenses on their husband’s credit card” (attributes to Experian)
• women are 85% of consumer spending
• women make 80% of consumer buying decisions
• “luxury brands” example
• men have more:
  • mortgage debt
  • car loan debt
  • personal credit card debt
• Interpretation: men expected to provide; feminists should “provide for the men” if they cared about equality

B14) “Women not equally important” examples

Pearl claims women aren’t equally important because they don’t do equal work:

• men invented “majority of inventions”
• men started Fortune 500 companies
• men do majority of infrastructure jobs
• says men produce “90%” of:
  • “scrubbing the toilet” (garbled)
  • food supply
  • “world’s stuff”
• diaper question:
  • “Who’s changing the diapers?”
  • says “Not women… they’re not having kids”
  • says daycare workers do it, “not the moms”

B15) “It’s a rich critique” example (jobs as talking)

• Pearl: Anna “talks for a living,” calls it “rich” for Anna to criticize her
• Anna: “I also talk… it’s not that hard of a job”
• Pearl: claims Anna pretends it’s more important than it is

Closings (Pearl’s long “you win” chain) — every example she lists

Pearl structures her closing as: “Feminists wanted X. You win. Here are the tools/conditions you got.” Examples include:

B16) Body autonomy / sex / abortion examples

• “12 types of birth control”
• “Uber Eats a Plan B”
• “abortion on demand”
  • where not available: “a weekend trip”
• “aborted an eighth of the world population”
• “a third of Gen Z” (in later remarks earlier too)
• “rape culture” framing:
  • If raped/assaulted or “revokes consent after the fact,” woman can get a man:
    • fired
    • kicked out of school
    • thrown in jail
• “sexually liberated”
  • men invented Tinder and Hinge so random men can “come to your door”
  • “men from your hometown are not good enough”
  • men invented social media so you can “get flown out” by highest status men
• “sell your nudes on the internet and become a billionaire”
• “unprotected sex on camera” and get paid
• “bang 300 men”
• “have 10 abortions” (explicit example)
• “study underwater basket weaving” and get sympathy when degree pays no money

B17) Household convenience tech examples

• men invented:
  • dishwasher
  • Roomba
  • air fryer
  • fast food
  • Uber Eats
  • “meal prep services”
  • “cheap restaurants”
• “work from home” and still have family

B18) Fertility and reproduction tech examples

• men invented IVF to give “another five years of fertility”
  • “husbands pay for the IVF”
  • pushing to get IVF taxpayer funded
• men invented surrogacy so “another woman can do it for you”
• “wait till 40 to have a baby”
• “freeze your face” (cosmetic youth preservation in her framing)

B19) Weight loss / beauty / cosmetic examples

• “Ozump” (Ozempic)
• men invented:
  • Botox
  • hair dye
  • filters on your phone
  • nose jobs
  • lash extensions
  • makeup
  • AI to make you look thinner
• jabs Anna: “Anna knows plastic surgery… you should look into it” (as said)

B20) Lifestyle / spending / marriage exploitation examples

• “earn a living sitting on your ass”
• “getting fat”
• “spending money you don’t have”
• “marry someone to pay it off”
• “divorce him”
• put him on alimony and child support
• “get a Roomba”
• “abort your kid”
• “order any cooked food to your door”
• “get a self-driving car”
• then “complain to men” they made you lazy/fat
• “take a DEI position that pays 300k a year”

B21) Institutions and groups “destroyed” example

• “destroyed every single male group… like Boy Scouts”
• “falsely accuse men of rape/harassment/endless lawsuits”

B22) Power examples

• feminists/women have:
  • more political power
  • more voting power
  • more spending power
• corporations cater to women (primary purchasers)
• politicians cater because they need the vote

B23) “Equality for men” examples Pearl says feminism doesn’t pursue

• equal men’s shelters
• equal funding for men’s cancer
• “real equality”
• claims she checked “20 different feminist websites” and none mentioned men’s issues; only “special treatment”

B24) Men’s legal/structural disadvantage examples

• “Men have to pay child support to a rapist”
• men not believed when abused
• men “die at work and at war”
• child support 18 to 21 years
• men register for Selective Service
• men not given additional consideration for:
  • college admissions
  • jobs
  • opportunities
  • scholarships
• children not DNA tested at birth → paternity fraud not prosecuted
• men majority of homeless
• men majority of suicides
• “women can hit men and men can’t hit back”
• “1.6 million men have committed suicide” (Pearl’s repeated figure)

Pearl’s big anecdote: Terrence Pop (every detail she gives)

• “33-year combat veteran” Terrence Pop (spelled “Terren Pop”)
• Served through three wars, almost killed in two
• Married, had two children, served in U.S. Army
• Deployed to Iraq in 2004
• Airborne infantry; wounded by a roadside bomb
  • suffered TBI and a stroke
  • evacuated; took over two years to recover
• While recovering, wife “plotting to divorce him”
• Wife murdered his “six-year-old chocolate lab” out of spite because he filed first
• Quote attributed to wife: “I told you I did not want you living here.”
• Forced to leave the marital home; lived out of his car
• Divorce took home, children; left penniless; saddled with unaffordable child support
• Had to pay $144,000 over a 12-year period
• Went to court for 50/50 custody
  • called a “murderer” and an “assassin” in open court
  • got 96 hours/month with his children (“96 hours a month is not a father”)
• While homeless, spoke to other men stuck due to:
  • child support arrears/penalties
  • arrests for unpaid child support
• Became suicidal
• In 2008, a former commander visited to “secretly say last goodbyes”
  • next day commander put on dress blues
  • went to (she says) Holy National Veteran Cemetery
  • “blew his brains out”
• Pearl: commander “took the bullet meant for him”
• Terrence Pop later spent “last 20 years” saving 576 men from suicide “with comedy”
• He’s holding “dog tags for every life” he saved

Interrogation/Open-debate “evidence” Pearl cites (all specifics)

• False reports claim:
  • 41% of 109 rape cases in a “Midwestern city” were admitted false by complainant
  • Anna asks which city; Pearl doesn’t specify
• Suicide after divorce:
  • “men are nine times more likely to commit suicide after a divorce compared to women”
  • Anna asks for women’s number; Pearl doesn’t provide
• Child support payment example:
  • Anna’s $441/month; Pearl reframes by income example:
    • $441/month is “for someone making $24,000/year”
    • Pearl uses $500/month on $24k/year as “how does he live?”
• Custody study claim:
  • “Massive study out of Massachusetts” of 24,000 divorces
  • claims only 8% of cases men asked for custody
• Disputed custody claim:
  • Pearl says “90% of disputed custody goes to women”
  • Anna calls it made up and asks source
• Paternity fraud hooks:
  • “If a man doesn’t find out he’s the father over the age of two, he’s on the hook for 18 years”
  • Later: “estimated 6% of men are fathering children that are not theirs”
  • References “blood bank association” (earlier in opening she cites American Association of Blood Banksand “one-third of paternity tests negative”)
• Defamation / false accusation punishment example:
  • Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp
  • “He had to go to two different countries to clear his name”
  • Pearl wants a woman who falsely accuses rape to get “the same time he would have gotten”
• Draft / war dead example:
  • “125K men were drafted and buried overseas”
  • references World War I and World War II
• Protection order example (Pearl’s description):
  • “PP order” issued when woman says she doesn’t feel safe
  • man not in court, no defense, can’t face accuser
  • loses Second Amendment rights
  • servicemen/first responders lose careers

Named “models/doctrines” Pearl cites

• Duluth model (assumes men are aggressor)
• tender years doctrine (used to justify removing father)
• no-fault divorce (mentions it)
• Selective Service (repeated)

Moderator / misc third-party examples that matter (because they’re used in arguments)

• Host frames debate format: opening statements → interrogations → open debate → closings
• Host pushes “no attacking / no names” (then people still do it)
• Host’s later framing question: whether laws/courts have shifted due to workforce/culture changes and advocacy

Boundary note

This is complete for the pasted excerpt only. If there’s more of this debate outside what you pasted (earlier open debate, or later after the break), I haven’t listed examples from those unseen sections.

Below is a consolidated, “all-examples + major-claims fact check” pack for the Anna vs Pearl segment you pasted (opening statements → interrogations → open debate → closings). I’m separating:

1. Examples / counterexamples each side used (these are rhetorical “instances,” not necessarily verified facts)
2. Fact-check of major measurable/legal claims (verdicts: Supported / Partly supported / Unsubstantiated / Misleading / Incorrect based on what can be substantiated from reliable public sources)

1) Examples and counterexamples used in the debate (by side)

A) Anna’s examples (and “counterexample” moves)

These are the concrete examples she invokes to support her case or to rebut Pearl’s framing:

• Pearl’s prior statement (Tim Pool / “Culture War” podcast, May 2024): Pearl said women “aren’t really doing much,” not having kids, not contributing much “when you look at output,” and uses that to argue women shouldn’t vote.
• Women’s work as economic contribution: unpaid labor (household work, childcare, eldercare) as “real” contribution, even if not counted in GDP.
• Healthcare as a “women-dominated indispensable sector”: women as a dominant share of the healthcare workforce.
• Education gains: women earning a larger share of BA/MA degrees now vs 1960.
• “Competing with China”: an educated/skilled population as a geopolitical/economic necessity (multipolar framing).
• Domestic violence decline: argues feminist-era policy changes (protective orders, shelter funding) helped reduce intimate partner violence and enabled leaving abusive relationships; links to improved child outcomes.
• Title IX (1972): presented as a feminist-policy win that expanded women’s opportunity.
• Pearl as a “beneficiary” example: Elmhurst University volleyball record; pro volleyball in London; “could have been traditional but didn’t.”
• Economic instability + social media/internet: offered as alternative explanations for relationship strain, marriage delay, and birth-rate decline (instead of blaming feminism).
• Pearl’s advice to men (Trent Horn debate): cites Pearl saying men should “shack up” rather than marry; Pearl’s “women are too fat and STD infected” style argument (Anna uses it to paint Pearl as anti-marriage and contemptuous).
• Promiscuity “both sexes”: asserts men are “just as promiscuous as women” (used to rebut “women are the problem” framing).
• In the open debate:
  • Jeffrey Epstein as a high-profile example of “the court system failing women victims,” countering Pearl’s “courts are unfair to men” focus.
  • Aziz Ansari as an example of MeToo “devolving” into something “laughable” (she frames this as a reason she avoids the “feminist” label, while still wanting equality).
  • Amber Heard / Johnny Depp: disputes Pearl’s “why isn’t Amber Heard in jail?” framing; questions prison as a defamation penalty.
  • Sister-in-law as a cop: counterexample to “women can’t do it” claims.
  • Maternal mortality: counters “women don’t die like men do” by pointing to pregnancy/childbirth risk.
• Marriage “what men get out of it”: partner/teammate/building a life; rejects Pearl’s “marriage is just risk.”

B) Pearl’s examples (and “counterexample” moves)

These are the concrete examples she invokes to support her case or rebut Anna’s framing:

• “Dirty and dangerous jobs” example set: logging, plumbing, crab fishing, oil rigs; claim: men dominate because of physical capacity.
• “Men walk away” scenario: men stop doing dangerous jobs, stop marrying, stop having kids → society breaks; says feminists have “no plan.”
• Importing labor: says government will import men from other countries to do those jobs; then “what if they date American women and stop too?”
• “No gratitude” examples: “microphone built by men,” “building built by men.”
• Marriage skepticism examples:
  • “Cheaper to keep her”
  • “Happy wife, happy life”
  • “Men get a partner who gains 25 lbs in 5 years”
• Anecdote-as-proof structure:
  • Terrence Pop story (33-year combat veteran; divorce while recovering; wife killed his dog; homelessness; child support total; custody hours; commander suicide; “576 men saved”)
  • Additional interviews: dad powerless over child transitioning; dad spent $300k; father went overseas (Ukraine) to be near kid; “everybody knows somebody…”
• Sexual marketplace / promiscuity examples:
  • OnlyFans/prostitution claims
  • Tinder/Hinge “random men come to your door”
  • “women too fat / STD infected” line (referenced via the Trent Horn debate in Anna’s opening; Pearl uses similar vibes repeatedly)
• Abortion / contraception / convenience tech list (closing): dishwasher, Roomba, air fryer, fast food, meal prep services, cheap restaurants, Uber Eats / Plan B delivery, IVF, surrogacy, Ozempic, Botox, hair dye, filters, nose jobs, lash extensions, makeup, “AI to look thinner,” “freeze your face,” “self-driving car,” “DEI job 300k,” “underwater basket weaving degree,” etc. (These function as rhetorical examples of modern convenience + alleged decadence.)
• Paternity fraud and child support examples:
  • “paternity fraud unpunished”
  • “one-third of paternity tests negative”
  • “men pay child support to a rapist”
  • “men can’t opt out of parenthood”
• False accusation examples:
  • cites a “41% of 109 rape reports” claim from one Midwestern city
  • argues for symmetric punishment (false accuser gets same sentence as accused would have)
• Women in male-coded roles as failure examples:
  • “women fly planes, they crash them”
  • “women almost burned down California”
  • “women in police are 10% and cause problems”
• Legal-system examples:
  • selective service (men register; women don’t)
  • ex parte protection orders (“man can’t face accuser”)
  • Duluth model (assumes male aggressor)
  • “tender years doctrine”
  • sentencing disparity (“women get a third of the time”)
• Macro-stat framing examples:
  • “men are majority homeless / suicides”
  • “1.6 million men committed suicide since 1970”
  • “men 9x more likely suicide after divorce”
  • “by 2050 more men will have committed suicide than all world wars combined” (used as a shock-stat)

2) Fact-check of major claims (both sides)

I’m focusing on the big, measurable, or legal claims that drive the argument. When a claim is more rhetorical (“women ruined cars”), I’m not treating it as fact-checkable.

A) Anna — major claims

B) Pearl — major claims

3) What you can safely say after the fact-check (high signal)

Anna’s strongest fact-grounded points (from this excerpt)

• Women ≈ 47% of employed persons and women ≈ 78% of health care & social assistance employment (so “nearly 80% healthcare” is broadly consistent).
• Her broader “women contribute substantially to the economy” narrative is consistent with labor-force reality, even if some of her GDP dollar figures need the exact underlying report to verify.

Pearl’s strongest fact-grounded points (from this excerpt)

• Selective Service is still male-only (legally meaningful asymmetry).
• Male dominance in many dangerous/trade/infrastructure jobs is directionally true; where she becomes vulnerable is the precision-stat pile and the sweeping “therefore women aren’t equally important” moral leap.

The biggest “stat credibility” weaknesses in this excerpt

• Pearl’s headline shock stats (OnlyFans prevalence, abortions as “1/8 of the world,” “1/3 of Gen Z aborted,” “one-third paternity tests negative” without context) are either unsupported, misleading, or phrased so absolutely they’re almost certainly wrong.
• Anna’s weaker zone is where she gives exact divorce-family-court numbers (alimony %, custody splits, child support averages) without naming the dataset edition/table.

4) Copyable source links (Markdown-friendly for Obsidian)

BLS CPS Table A-16 (employed persons by industry, sex): https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat16.htm
Reuters on Selective Service / women registration debate (context for “men-only registration” status): (see Reuters coverage; the specific Reuters page varies by syndication)
Bureau of Justice Statistics (topic page) – Intimate partner violence trend reporting is typically housed here:
https://bjs.ojp.gov/

If you want, I can also rewrite your existing “each side’s examples list” output by inserting a short “Fact-check” line right under each claim (so it reads like: Claim → examples → counterexamples → fact-check verdict), but I’d need you to paste the version of the output you want me to merge into, so I’m matching your structure exactly.