Skip to content
Read • Question • ConnectAnthony’s notes & researchReturn with a new question
Anthony’s NotesA personal field guide
From the notebook

Ancient Civilizations

Mayans

The Maya civilization, which thrived in Mesoamerica from approximately 2000 BCE to 1500 CE, did not leave behind explicit written records on topics like same-sex marriage or detailed discussions about gender in the way modern societies might. However, we can infer some aspects from archaeological evidence, art, and the cultural practices of their descendants:

  • Gender Roles: Mayan society was traditionally structured around binary gender roles, where men and women had distinct societal roles. Men typically engaged in activities like warfare, governance, and certain forms of labor, while women were primarily involved in family care, weaving, and other domestic tasks. However, there are indications of more fluid gender expressions:
    • Muxes: In contemporary Zapotec culture, which has Maya influences, there’s a recognized third gender known as “muxes” (derived from the Spanish “mujeres” for women). Muxes are assigned male at birth but adopt roles and identities that blend or transcend traditional male and female roles. While this modern practice doesn’t directly reflect ancient Maya views, it suggests a historical continuity of gender diversity in the region.
  • Same-Sex Relationships: There isn’t direct evidence that the Mayans had specific terms or ceremonies for same-sex marriages. However:
    • Art and Depictions: Some Mayan art and ceramics depict scenes that could be interpreted as homoerotic or at least show same-sex interactions in various contexts, which might suggest that such relationships existed, even if not formally recognized as “marriage.”
    • Colonial Records: After the Spanish conquest, there are records from colonial times where indigenous practices, which might include same-sex behaviors, were condemned or noted with disdain by the Catholic priests, indicating that such behaviors were part of the pre-Columbian cultural landscape.
  • Religious and Cultural Context: The Mayans practiced a polytheistic religion with deities that could exhibit both male and female characteristics, suggesting a cultural acknowledgment of gender fluidity in the spiritual realm. However, societal norms were likely more rigid in daily life.
  • Interpretation Challenges: Much of what we understand comes from interpretations of art, the biases of Spanish chroniclers, or modern cultural practices. There’s a risk of over-interpreting or reading contemporary values back into ancient practices.

In summary, while there’s no clear evidence that the Mayans had a formalized concept of same-sex marriage or a widely recognized spectrum of gender identities, there are hints that gender fluidity and diverse sexual practices might have existed within the broader cultural context. Modern interpretations often look to these clues to understand pre-Columbian attitudes towards gender and sexuality. If you’re looking for more specific or visual insights, I can generate images based on descriptions, but for detailed historical analysis, further academic research or consultation with anthropologists specializing in Mayan culture would be necessary.

Two-spirited People

The term “two-spirit” (or “two-spirited”) comes from the English translation of the Anishinaabe word “niizh manidoowag,” which was coined in 1990 during the Third Annual Inter-tribal First Nations/Native American Gay and Lesbian Conference in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Here’s a detailed look at its history:

Origins and Context:

  • Pre-Colonial Indigenous Cultures: Before European colonization, many Indigenous cultures in North America recognized individuals who might now be described as two-spirit. These individuals often held revered or specialized roles within their societies, sometimes combining or transcending traditional gender roles. Terms like “berdache” (a term now considered offensive) were used by early European explorers and anthropologists to describe these individuals, but this did not capture the cultural nuances or respect these individuals were given in their communities.
  • Colonial Impact: With the arrival of European settlers, many of these cultural roles were misunderstood, suppressed, or eradicated due to colonial attitudes towards gender and sexuality, which were often binary and rigid.

The Term “Two-Spirit”:

  • 1990 Conference: The term “two-spirit” was introduced as a contemporary, pan-Indigenous term to describe Indigenous people who embody both masculine and feminine spirits or those who do not fit into conventional binary gender roles. This was an effort to reclaim and redefine identities in a way that was more aligned with Indigenous languages and cultural concepts rather than Western terminologies like “gay,” “lesbian,” or “transgender.”
  • Cultural Significance: The term was meant to encompass a wide range of gender identities and roles that varied from tribe to tribe, such as the Navajo “nádleehí,” the Lakota “winkte,” or the Zuni “lhamana.” It provided a common ground for discussion and identity among diverse Indigenous groups while acknowledging the unique cultural expressions within each.

Evolution and Usage:

  • Reclamation and Healing: The introduction of “two-spirit” was part of a broader movement of cultural reclamation and healing from the impacts of colonialism, including the suppression of Indigenous sexual and gender diversity.
  • Current Usage: Today, “two-spirit” is used by some Indigenous people to describe their gender, sexual, or spiritual identity. However, its use varies; some prefer traditional terms from their own cultures, while others embrace “two-spirit” for its inclusivity across different Indigenous nations. It’s important to recognize that not all Indigenous queer or gender-nonconforming individuals identify as two-spirit; it’s one of many possible identities.
  • Challenges: There have been criticisms and challenges regarding the term, including concerns about pan-Indigenous oversimplification, appropriation by non-Indigenous people, and debates over who can claim the identity.
  • Global Recognition: Over time, “two-spirit” has gained recognition beyond North America, influencing discussions on gender diversity in Indigenous cultures worldwide, though its specific application remains tied to North American Indigenous contexts.

Academic and Cultural Representation:

  • Literature and Media: The term has entered academic discourse, appearing in studies of Indigenous history, anthropology, gender studies, and more. It’s also represented in art, literature, and activism, contributing to broader conversations about Indigenous rights, gender, and decolonization.

In summary, “two-spirit” symbolizes a modern Indigenous identity that seeks to honor traditional roles while addressing contemporary issues of gender and sexuality within the context of decolonization. Its history reflects both continuity with pre-colonial cultural practices and the ongoing struggle for recognition and respect in a post-colonial world.

The term “two-spirit” was first introduced at the Third Annual Inter-tribal First Nations/Native American Gay and Lesbian Conference held in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, in 1990. The person credited with proposing this term is Elder Myra Laramee (Cree). According to reports, Myra Laramee received the term “two-spirit” in a dream, which she shared with the attendees at the conference. This dream was pivotal in the adoption of the term as a way to describe Indigenous individuals who embody both masculine and feminine spirits, moving away from colonial and derogatory terms like “berdache.”

This act of receiving the term through a dream underscores the spiritual and cultural significance of “two-spirit” within Indigenous communities, reflecting a connection to traditional ways of understanding gender and identity that were disrupted by colonization.