Skip to content
Read • Question • ConnectAnthony’s notes & researchReturn with a new question
Anthony’s NotesA personal field guide
From the notebook

Ethnic Cleansing

⬅️ Key Arguments (MOC) · Related: Genocide · Population Transfer · Nakba · ethnic_cleansing_displacement_arguments · Rohingya Parallel - Selective Attention and the Nakba Analogy

One-line rebuttal

Ethnic cleansing means forcibly and permanently removing a group with intent to change the demographics. Israel warns civilians out of a battle zone and lets them return — the opposite. The side that has actually carried out ethnic cleansing, over a century, is the Arab one — against Jews.

Core points

  1. Warnings ≠ cleansing. Evacuation warnings to reduce civilian deaths are what you do instead of cleansing (data below). → REF - Displacement Ethnic Cleansing and Genocide
  2. The projection. Pro-Palestinian “return” is celebrated when Jews are removed (Sinai, Gaza) and demanded again in the West Bank. → Population Transfer
  3. Whose stated aim? An ethnically cleansed Palestine was the Arab movement’s goal from the 1920s–40s (Benny Morris, below).
  4. Erasure. PA textbooks and the destruction of Jewish sites (Joseph’s Tomb) delete the Jewish presence itself.

Consistency test — Rohingya displacement

Myanmar’s treatment of the Rohingya is a strong comparative case because it combines citizenship exclusion, targeted village destruction, mass flight, confiscation or repurposing of property, and continuing barriers to safe return. A UN fact-finding mission found grounds to investigate and prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. The comparison does not decide whether any Israeli operation constitutes forcible transfer or ethnic cleansing. It tests whether the same definitions, proof of intent, evidentiary thresholds, and moral urgency are being applied across cases. See Myanmar and Malaysia - Rohingya Persecution and Refugee Treatment and Rohingya Parallel - Selective Attention and the Nakba Analogy.

🎯 Warnings, Not Cleansing (the mitigation record)

Israel’s conduct is the opposite of demographic removal — it warns civilians to leave combat zones:

  • 4.4 million texts sent
  • 1.5 million maps and fliers dropped
  • 20,000 phone calls · 6 million voicemails
  • Continued supply of ~45% of electricity and ~10% of water into an active war zone

“Cutting off utilities to motivate people to leave” would still be temporary, battle-driven evacuation — not permanent, intent-based demographic removal.

📖 The demographics disprove it — On Democracies and Death Cults (p.27)

Israel’s non-Jewish population grew 17-fold, 156,000 (1948) → 2,653,000 (2024); Jerusalem’s Muslim population grew 9× (40,000 → 371,400). You cannot “ethnically cleanse” a population into multiplying. → On Democracies and Death Cults

🔁 The Projection — Actual Ethnic Cleansing Runs the Other Way

📜 The Arab Movement’s Stated Aim (Benny Morris)

The idea of an ethnically cleansed Palestine was raised consistently by the Palestinian Arab national movement from the 1920s through the 1940s, and there are good grounds to believe that that was the aim of the Arab onslaught on the Yishuv—the Jewish community in Palestine—in 1947–1948 (or, at least, that that would have been its outcome had the onslaught been successful). From the other side, the idea of a partial or full expulsion of Palestine’s Arabs by the Jews was discussed and supported by much of the Zionist leadership in the late 1930s and the 1940s, against the backdrop of the Arab Revolt of 1936–1939 and the Holocaust, and in some way this thinking contributed to the creation of the Arab refugee problem in 1948. One State, Two States, p.42 (file not included in this release)

The complete deletion of the Jewish presence in and history of the country is epitomized in the textbooks published by the Palestine National Authority since the 1990s, in the destruction by Palestinians of Jewish sites in the PNA-controlled territories during the Second Intifada (for example, the torching of “Joseph’s Tomb” in Nablus), and in the repeated “historical” pronouncements on this matter by the leader of the Palestinian national movement between 1969 and 2004, PLO chairman Yasser Arafat. One State, Two States, p.51 (file not included in this release)

🧪 Destiny’s Thought Experiment

See Also