Skip to content
Read • Question • ConnectAnthony’s notes & researchReturn with a new question
Anthony’s NotesA personal field guide
From the notebook

60.9.3.2 Ethics

Ethics asks what we ought to do, what moral claims mean, and how judgment works. Use the topic maps below for study; use the religion-and-morality route for your current argument-building and speaking practice.

Keep the questions separate

Recall four questions: Which claim? Why only God? What reasons? Why better?
From your live debate map. These questions distinguish the claim, its proposed foundation, your positive reasons, and the comparison of accounts.


Start here

  1. Get the map: Big‑picture Map Of Moral Philosophy → Philosophical Foundations for Morality and Their Thinkers.
  2. Separate the layers: Objective Moral Systems → Moral Psychology Does Not Settle Metaethics. A normative theory, a theory of moral truth, and an account of moral motivation answer different questions.
  3. Follow your current project: Morality and Religion - Learning Path → Does Morality Require Religion - Master → Morality and Religion - Move Drill. Your working Kantian argument and the remaining foundational questions stay in that project.
  4. Find the lecturer: Lance Bush / Lance Independent — the strong match to your notebook entry about Wilson, with verified credentials and sources.

Metaethics: meaning, truth, and justification

Topic map: Metaethics

Normative ethics: duties, outcomes, and character

Topic map: Normative Ethics

Moral psychology, sentiment, and motivation

Topic map: Moral Psychology

Morality, religion, and live debate

Topic map: Debates and Religion · Current practice: Does Morality Require Religion - Master

Applied ethics and political connections

Casework map: Applied Ethics

Courses, books, and cross-vault routes

Study map: Study Resources · Unified philosophy curriculum


Auto-index